06 — Tool Migration & Modernisation
Tool Migration & Modernisation
Test tool migration to Tricentis: moving off UFT, OpenText ALM, Worksoft Certify or qMetry — with a full inventory of what you have and a migration path that keeps your coverage intact.
The problem
Your test estate outlived its tool.
A migration is rarely triggered by the tool alone. Licences are up for renewal, the vendor has changed the product direction, or the suite has grown to a point where nobody can say what it still covers. In parallel, the release train keeps running — so the migration has to happen without a gap in regression coverage.
The risk is not the export. It is discovering, months in, that a third of the migrated test cases were duplicates, that nobody knows the expected results, or that the new tool is being used exactly like the old one.
The business outcome
Same coverage, lower maintenance, a suite your team can still read in two years.
- Regression coverage preserved through the switch, with a documented mapping from old to new
- A smaller, deduplicated test base instead of a one-to-one copy of historic debt
- Module and test data conventions that make the new suite maintainable
- Licence and platform costs that reflect what you actually use
- A team that can extend the suite without external help
What we take responsibility for
Inventory, decision, migration, handover.
- Inventory and analysis of the existing estate: test cases, modules, test data, integrations, custom code
- A carry-over decision per asset — migrate, rebuild, consolidate or retire — agreed with your test managers
- Target architecture in the new tool: module structure, reusable components, test data approach, naming conventions
- Migration execution, including automated conversion where it is safe and manual rebuild where it is not
- Pipeline and test management integration, traceability back to requirements
- Enablement of your team and a defined handover, or continued operation as a managed testing team
Typical deliverables
What lands on your desk.
- Estate inventory with coverage and duplication analysis
- Migration design and carry-over decision log
- Effort and risk estimate per migration wave
- Target module architecture and test data concept
- Migrated and executable test suite in the new tool
- Traceability mapping from legacy assets to migrated assets
- Enablement sessions and documentation for your team
Supported platforms
From UFT, Worksoft, Selenium and ALM to Tosca and qTest.
Migrating from
- OpenText UFT One
- OpenText ALM / Quality Center
- Worksoft Certify
- qMetry
- Excel and Word-based test catalogues
- Custom Selenium frameworks
Migrating to
- Tricentis Tosca
- Tricentis Tosca Cloud
- Tricentis qTest
- SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis
- Playwright and Selenide frameworks
Integrated with
- Jira and Azure DevOps
- Azure Pipelines, Jenkins, GitLab CI
- SAP Cloud ALM
- Tricentis qTest and LiveCompare
How we work
Five phases, each with a defined result.
01
Assessment
Inventory of the estate, coverage and duplication analysis, first effort range.
02
Migration design
Target architecture, carry-over decisions, wave planning and risk register.
03
Pilot wave
One business-critical process end to end in the new tool, to validate the design before scale.
04
Migration waves
Execution in agreed waves, with regression coverage maintained throughout.
05
Handover or run
Enablement and documentation — or continued operation by our managed testing team.
Project experience
Two recent migrations.
- Insurance · Switzerland — migration of the UFT regression base and its variants to Tosca Cloud. The regression suite runs in Tosca Cloud.
- Healthcare · Switzerland — QMetry to Tricentis qTest in a single night: 5,047 test cases and 11,508 executions, every object reconciled.
- Defence & industry · Germany — conversion of a manual SAP test catalogue into automated Tosca tests on-premise, with performance and load tests built on the same processes. Ongoing.
Questions we get asked
Before the contract, not after.
Do we have to freeze releases during the migration?
No. We plan in waves and keep the legacy suite running until the migrated wave has passed in parallel. Regression coverage is never handed over on a promise.
What happens to test cases that are not worth migrating?
They are documented and retired with your test managers, not silently dropped. The carry-over decision log records what was migrated, consolidated or retired, and why — which is usually the artefact audit asks for.
Who owns the suite afterwards, and what does it cost to run?
Your team, if that is what you want — enablement and documentation are part of the engagement. If you would rather not build the capacity, our managed testing team runs it under defined responsibility. Both options are priced before the migration starts, not after.
Start here
Tool Migration Assessment
For teams moving off UFT, OpenText ALM, Worksoft Certify or qMetry. We inventory what you have, decide what is worth carrying over and design the migration path that keeps your coverage intact.
You receive
Inventory, migration design, effort and risk estimate
We usually respond within one business day.
Not sure a migration is the right next step?
Tell us what you are running today. If the answer is to modernise in place rather than migrate, we will say so.